Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thoughts on culture & politics, by Robert Stanley Martin
Click here for Pol Culture's Twitter page.
The reviews here are intended as journalistic critiques of the works in question, not promotional or advertising copy.
This site occasionally reviews material that was provided free of charge by the publisher or producer. Readers should assume that this is the case with all posted reviews. Government agencies should not assume that all materials reviewed here are gifts subject to taxation. The site author maintains private records of which material was lent, bought, or rented, and which was provided free of charge by outside parties. This paragraph is intended only as a caveat lecteur.
The site is also a participant in the Powell's Books Partnership Program. At or near the top of each review, a link is provided to the Web page where the work can be purchased on the Powell's Books Web site. The site receives a small percentage of the price of each item purchased from Powell's after following the link. This is offered as a service to interested readers that also provides an opportunity to support this site.
This notice is intended to bring this Web site into compliance with Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR Part 255.
Disclaimer posted October 7, 2009.
© 2008-2013 Robert Stanley Martin
1 comment:
Agree. I'm usually a fan of Clooney's work, both as an actor and as a director, but this was terrible. I walked out of the theater thinking, "If I ever meet George Clooney, we are going to have a long conversation about this movie." What particularly bothered me is that it was only tangentially about politics. A political campaign was the setting, but it could have been any organization. But they clearly THOT that they were making a profound statement about politics. Such intentions, when they fail, become pretension.
Post a Comment