Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thoughts on culture & politics, by Robert Stanley Martin
Click here for Pol Culture's Twitter page.
The reviews here are intended as journalistic critiques of the works in question, not promotional or advertising copy.
This site occasionally reviews material that was provided free of charge by the publisher or producer. Readers should assume that this is the case with all posted reviews. Government agencies should not assume that all materials reviewed here are gifts subject to taxation. The site author maintains private records of which material was lent, bought, or rented, and which was provided free of charge by outside parties. This paragraph is intended only as a caveat lecteur.
The site is also a participant in the Powell's Books Partnership Program. At or near the top of each review, a link is provided to the Web page where the work can be purchased on the Powell's Books Web site. The site receives a small percentage of the price of each item purchased from Powell's after following the link. This is offered as a service to interested readers that also provides an opportunity to support this site.
This notice is intended to bring this Web site into compliance with Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR Part 255.
Disclaimer posted October 7, 2009.
© 2008-2013 Robert Stanley Martin
3 comments:
"Ozu concerns himself entirely with serving the story"
I don't believe that is the case. A lot of what Ozu does from a formal and aesthetic point of view has very little to do with the story. In many ways his visual style is such that it is in excess of the story. The strictly planned composition of his shots, the way he cuts, and shifts scenes (those wonderful sequences of cuts that he uses in many of his films to transition from one location to another), all of those do not serve the story in any conventional sense.
I have seen Tokyo Story in a few years, but I've watched a lot of his later movies multiple times in the recent past and I can't imagine it's that much different.
This piece was more a quick impression of the film than a carefully considered review. That said, there's very little in the film that struck me as decorative, extraneous, or at odds with the story. Maybe we're paying attention to different things. The filmmaking seemed focused on dramatizing the script to the exclusion of all else. It struck me as quite austere. It certainly isn't flamboyant the way, say, Kurosawa's work is. I haven't seen any of Ozu's other films, so I can't say if this is atypical of them or not.
Like I said, haven't seen Tokyo Story in a long time and it is earlier than the ones I've watch most frequently.
I'd highly recommend some of his later color films like An August Afternoon (its own Criterion release) or End of the Summer (from the Late Ozu boxset).
Post a Comment