Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thoughts on culture & politics, by Robert Stanley Martin
Click here for Pol Culture's Twitter page.
The reviews here are intended as journalistic critiques of the works in question, not promotional or advertising copy.
This site occasionally reviews material that was provided free of charge by the publisher or producer. Readers should assume that this is the case with all posted reviews. Government agencies should not assume that all materials reviewed here are gifts subject to taxation. The site author maintains private records of which material was lent, bought, or rented, and which was provided free of charge by outside parties. This paragraph is intended only as a caveat lecteur.
The site is also a participant in the Powell's Books Partnership Program. At or near the top of each review, a link is provided to the Web page where the work can be purchased on the Powell's Books Web site. The site receives a small percentage of the price of each item purchased from Powell's after following the link. This is offered as a service to interested readers that also provides an opportunity to support this site.
This notice is intended to bring this Web site into compliance with Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR Part 255.
Disclaimer posted October 7, 2009.
© 2008-2013 Robert Stanley Martin
7 comments:
Your reviews have been wonderful. The tone you used, the observations you made, the insights you gave me...beautiful. Thank you.
I loved Swamp thing as a greasy teenager. I still do as a greasy adult.
Something about the addition of the Abby character felt right. Her strange individuality and sex appeal, like Jean Grey meets Nadine Cross from the Stand, was a great counter-point to the "inhuman" Swamp thing.
Also, your link to the horrible I Am Legend adaptation is borked (typo?).
GM--
I'm not quite sure what was wrong with the link, but it seems to be working now.
when i first read these comics , it was my first exposure to alfredo alcala and i was heartbroken over totleben's absence . since then i've seen lots more alcala ( particularly his inks over john buscema in the savage sword of conan ) and i can understand why he was chosen to take over . he seems like the perfect replacement ! but it didn't work out the way . he does a good job but ... how can we account for this ? i blame different original page dimensions ( conan was for a magazine and probably done 1.5 - 2 times up from that size ) . any thoughts ? in retrospect , who might have done better work ?
alex--
No one working for Marvel or DC Comics on one of their properties has an entirely free hand with what they're doing. The rendering style to be used on a piece could very well have been dictated by the editor. (It probably was, just to maintain consistency. Alcala's work was often as elaborate as Totleben's.)
Deadlines can be a factor as well; Alcala could very well have felt more comfortable with the time he had to work on the Swamp Thing material.
You also can't discount questions of morale. By just about every account there is, DC has been a much better company to work for than Marvel for most of their histories. And who knows what was going on in Alcala's personal life? That can certainly affect the quality of work.
There are any number of reasons why someone may do better work at different times. All one can do is appreciate the difference.
we see a similar thing with bernie wrightson who spend all of the seventies moving towards greater complexity in his line-work only to seemingly burn out on his magnificent frankenstein illustrations and return to a much simpler style . i experience similar things with my own drawing . sometimes you just don't want to put in all those tiny little lines !
i should really check my sentences before i post them . i promise that i speak english as a first language .
Post a Comment